THE span of control is a fundamental concept in organisational management, yet it is often overlooked or misunderstood. In simple terms, it refers to the number of employees who report directly to a single manager.
The ideal span of control can significantly impact a team's effectiveness, productivity, and overall morale. In organisation structure analysis, we also look at what is referred to as the average span of control.
This is calculated by dividing the total headcount by the number of managerial nodes in an organisation structure. This could be the structure for the whole organisation or a department or team.
The span of control is related to the depth of the structure, which you must never overlook when reviewing your structures. Depth refers to the number of position boxes in an organogram, counting from lowest to highest. The ideal number of levels is five or less, and the optimum span of control is often targeted at a minimum of eight.
Why Does Span of Control Matter?
The ripple effects of misalignment
The span of control is far more than a numerical figure on an organisational chart. It serves as a linchpin for managerial effectiveness, employee engagement, and overall organisational performance.
The perils of a narrow span
- Lead with impact
- What 360-degree feedback can achieve and why
- Success life: How boardroom shapes corporate culture
- Span of control: Manager’s guide to finding the optimal balance
Keep Reading
A narrow span of control can create a cascade of negative consequences. When managers have too few direct reports, they often fall into the trap of micromanagement, stifling employee autonomy, creativity, and job satisfaction.
The constant scrutiny and lack of trust can lead to increased stress and hinder innovation. Furthermore, managers themselves may feel underutilised and bored, leading to disengagement and a desire for more challenging roles.
This ultimately creates a stagnant environment where both employees and managers are held back from reaching their full potential.
The pitfalls of a wide span
An excessively wide span of control can overwhelm managers, stretching their time and attention thin. This often results in high stress levels, burnout, and decreased job satisfaction for managers, while employees feel neglected due to the lack of personalised feedback and development opportunities.
Communication suffers as crucial information gets lost in the shuffle, leading to errors and delays. Furthermore, the potential of individual team members goes untapped as managers lack the capacity to identify and nurture their unique talents, hindering both personal growth and the organisation's succession planning.
The importance of balance
The optimal span of control is like a balancing act. It requires careful consideration of various factors and a willingness to adapt as circumstances change.
When the span of control is well-aligned, it creates a virtuous cycle of clear communication, employee empowerment, and managerial effectiveness. The result is a more agile, innovative, and high-performing organisation.
Finding the ‘Goldilocks’ zone
The ideal span of control is a dynamic equilibrium that hinges on numerous interconnected factors. It is a delicate balance that requires thoughtful consideration and continuous adaptation. Let us explore these factors in more detail:
Complexity and specialisation
The nature of the work itself significantly impacts the optimal span of control. Complex tasks, rife with intricate processes, specialisation, or ambiguity, necessitate a narrower span.
This allows managers to provide the frequent guidance, feedback, and support that employees need to navigate these complexities and ensure accurate and efficient completion.
Conversely, when tasks are simpler and more routine, employees require less direct supervision, making a wider span of control feasible. In this scenario, managers can shift their focus from micro-level oversight to broader coordination and strategic initiatives, leveraging the team's autonomy to drive efficiency.
Autonomy, self-direction
The skill and experience level of employees directly influence the optimal span of control. Highly skilled and experienced individuals possessing deep expertise and a strong sense of ownership thrive under wider spans.
These employees are self-directed, capable of independent problem-solving, and only seek guidance when truly necessary. This allows managers to focus on broader strategic goals rather than micromanaging tasks.
Conversely, newer or less experienced employees, who are still developing their skills, often require more hands-on guidance and support.
A narrower span of control in these situations allows managers to provide closer supervision, mentorship, and the necessary scaffolding for growth.
Delegation and trust
A manager's style and capabilities play a pivotal role in determining their ideal span of control. Delegative managers, adept at empowering their teams and fostering autonomy, can effectively oversee larger groups.
Their trust in employees' initiative and ability to deliver results allows them to focus on higher-level responsibilities. Conversely, hands-on managers, who thrive on close involvement and detailed guidance, often find that a narrower span of control enables them to provide the focused support their employees need, maximising their own strengths and the overall effectiveness of the team.
Collaboration
Organizational culture significantly influences the ideal span of control. Open, collaborative cultures, characterised by transparency, trust, and shared decision-making, often thrive with wider spans.
In these environments, employees are empowered to communicate openly, collaborate effectively across teams, and take ownership of their work, reducing the need for constant managerial oversight.
Conversely, hierarchical cultures with rigid structures and top-down communication may require narrower spans of control. Employees in these settings are typically less accustomed to autonomy and may rely more heavily on direct guidance from their managers. This necessitates a smaller team size for managers to provide the necessary level of support and direction.
Benchmarks
While the ideal span of control is highly dependent on context, general benchmarks exist across organisational levels. At the highest level, CEOs and top executives often oversee 4-12 direct reports, prioritising strategic vision and high-level decisions.
Departmental-level middle managers typically manage 6-10 employees, balancing hands-on guidance with resource allocation and goal alignment.
Team-level supervisors usually have three to eight direct reports, fostering close supervision, individual feedback, and team cohesion. However, in routine work environments, this span can reach up to 25.
Ultimately, the specific circumstances of the organisation and factors like work complexity, employee skills, and organisational culture must be carefully considered to determine the optimal span of control and ensure both organisational performance and employee satisfaction.
Tips for managers
To navigate the complexities of the span of control, managers should take a proactive and reflective approach. Begin by thoroughly assessing your team taking an honest look at the skills, experience levels, and individual needs of each employee.
Understand your own management style and comfort level with different team sizes. Are you a delegator who thrives with a larger team, or do you prefer a more hands-on approach with a smaller group?
Be adaptable and recognise that the ideal span of control may change over time as your team evolves, new members join, and projects shift in scope and complexity.
Communication is key — establish clear expectations, maintain open channels for dialogue, and ensure that everyone feels supported and informed.
Regularly seek feedback from your team to gauge their workload, identify any potential bottlenecks, and assess overall engagement levels.
By staying attuned to the dynamics of your team and adjusting your approach as needed, you can create an environment where both you and your employees can focus on being productive.
Conclusion
Span of control is a critical yet often underestimated aspect of organizational structure. By understanding the factors that influence the ideal span, considering average benchmarks, and taking a proactive approach, managers can create more effective, productive, and fulfilling work environments for everyone.
- Nguwi is an occupational psychologist, data scientist, speaker and managing consultant at Industrial Psychology Consultants (Pvt) Ltd, a management and HR consulting firm. https://www.linkedin.com/in/memorynguwi/ Phone +263 24 248 1 946-48/ 2290 0276, cell number +263 772 356 361 or e-mail: [email protected] or visit ipcconsultants.com.
