THE recent announcement of an 18% tariff on Zimbabwean exports to the United States, effective April 2, 2025, is set to reshape trade dynamics between the two nations.
This development follows the Trump administration’s broader policy of imposing reciprocal tariffs on various countries. Given that Zimbabwe exported US$67,8 million worth of goods to the US in 2024, according to US trade statistics, this tariff could have significant implications for exporters and business leaders in the country, as US importers may shun away from countries that attract high tariffs when selling to the US market.
However, trade between Zimbabwe and the United States has historically been limited, with major exports including sugar, tobacco, and ferroalloys.
According to the Observatory of Economic Complexity, Zimbabwe exported US$119 million worth of goods to the US in 2023, with ferroalloys accounting for 52,8% of the total, followed by raw tobacco at 21,9% and raw sugar at 12,2%.
While some products already faced substantial duties — tobacco, for instance, had a 27% tariff — this broad-based tariff increase will add pressure to US importers who were incurring little to no extra charges on goods imported from Zimbabwe.
Before the new tariff policy, Zimbabwean products entering the US faced varying tariff rates. Tobacco and tobacco substitutes were subject to a 27% tariff, while apparel and clothing accessories faced a 14% levy.
Raw hides and leather had a minimal tariff of 1%, whereas edible fats and oils were charged 3%. Sugar and confectionery products encountered a 12% tariff. With the new tariff structure, all Zimbabwean exports to the US will now face an 18% tariff, potentially reducing competitiveness in the American market.
Trump's administration justified the tariff using a formula based on the trade deficit between the two nations, which stood at US$24,1 million in 2024.
- Education crisis mirrors national problem
- USD fees: Govt policy failure hurting parents
- Zim has 2nd highest rising food prices: WB
- US raises red flag on abuse of journos in Zim
Keep Reading
By estimating the average tariff Zimbabwe imposes on US imports at 35%, Washington set a "discounted reciprocal tariff" of 18% on Zimbabwean goods. This development comes at a critical moment in Zimbabwe-US relations. For years, Zimbabwe has pursued a Look East Policy, prioritising economic ties with China, Russia, and other Asian economies.
This strategic pivot was largely driven by long-standing US sanctions, which constrained financial transactions and access to Western markets.
However, the March 4, 2024, Executive Order by the Biden administration marked a turning point by lifting sanctions on most individuals and corporations, as well as easing financial restrictions.
This move was expected to improve Zimbabwe’s economic relations with the US and create new opportunities for trade and investment. The imposition of the new tariffs risks reversing the progress made since the sanctions were lifted.
Increased costs for Zimbabwean exports could discourage businesses from expanding trade with the US due to the strain on competitiveness, reinforcing reliance on Eastern markets. The tariffs may also dampen confidence among investors who viewed the Executive Order as a step towards economic reintegration with the West. For Zimbabwe, this presents a dilemma: whether to persist in strengthening ties with the US or continue deepening economic engagements with traditional partners in the East. Zimbabwe’s response should combine diplomatic lobbying, market diversification, industrial policy, and value addition to mitigate the impact of US tariffs. By shifting towards regional trade, strengthening ties with emerging economies, and increasing local processing capacity, Zimbabwe can turn the tariff challenge into an opportunity for long-term economic resilience. The increased tariffs are expected to reduce export competitiveness, encouraging businesses to seek alternative markets. Sectors reliant on US demand, such as mining and agriculture, may experience reduced output or shifts in investment priorities. The policy may also influence Zimbabwean authorities to explore trade negotiations, leveraging regional agreements or diplomatic channels to mitigate the impact.
This article was written by the Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit membership-based organisation that provides services designed to support its members in business development.
