Unearthing inequality: Hidden costs of extractivism in DRC

Opinion
Influx of internally-displaced persons in Goma is straining already limited resources.

THE Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is one of the richest countries in terms of natural resources, boasting vast reserves of minerals such as cobalt, copper, and diamonds.

Yet, it remains one of the poorest nations globally, with a significant portion of its population living in poverty.

This paradox can be largely attributed to extractivism — a process where natural resources are extracted for export, often at the expense of local communities.

Recent events in Goma, a city in eastern Congo, have brought these issues to the forefront, highlighting the ongoing struggles of marginalised communities amidst the backdrop of conflict and exploitation.

Goma context

Goma, located near the Rwandan border, has been a focal point for violence and instability for decades. The region is rich in minerals, attracting various armed groups and foreign interests, all vying for control over these valuable resources.

In recent months, escalating tensions between armed groups and the Congolese army have led to increased violence, displacing thousands of residents and exacerbating the humanitarian crisis.

The situation in Goma reflects a broader pattern in the DRC, where the wealth generated from natural resources does not translate into improved living conditions for the local population.

Instead, it often fuels corruption, conflict, and further marginalisation. The government’s inability to provide security and basic services has left communities vulnerable, forcing many to rely on international aid, which is often insufficient.

Extractivism and its impact

The extractive industries in the DRC have historically prioritised profit over people. Corporations exploiting mineral wealth frequently neglect the environmental and social consequences of their operations.

This disregard contributes to environmental degradation, loss of arable land, and pollution of water sources, all of which directly impact local communities.

Moreover, the economic benefits of extractivism rarely reach those who need them most. Wealth generated from mining often ends up in the hands of multinational corporations and corrupt officials, leaving local communities to bear the brunt of the negative impacts. This dynamic perpetuates a cycle of poverty and inequality, undermining any potential for sustainable development in the region.

Human cost of conflict

The ongoing conflict in eastern Congo has resulted in a staggering humanitarian crisis. As armed groups continue to clash over control of resource-rich areas, civilians find themselves caught in the crossfire.

Displacement, violence, and human rights abuses are rampant, with women and children being particularly vulnerable. The United Nations reports that millions of people have been displaced, and many are living in precarious conditions without access to basic necessities such as food, clean water, and healthcare.

In Goma, the influx of internally-displaced persons has strained already limited resources, leading to heightened competition for aid and support.

This competition often breeds tension among communities, further exacerbating existing inequalities. The situation is a stark reminder that the consequences of extractivism extend far beyond economic metrics; they encompass the very fabric of society, undermining social cohesion and stability.

Marginalised communities

Amidst these challenges, marginalised communities in the DRC are beginning to organise and resist the forces that perpetuate their suffering.

Grassroots movements are emerging, advocating for land rights, environmental protection, and accountability from both the government and multinational corporations.

These movements seek to empower local populations, giving them a voice in decisions that affect their lives and livelihoods.

Community leaders and activists are working tirelessly to raise awareness about the injustices faced by their communities, often at great personal risk.

They highlight the need for equitable resource management that prioritises the well-being of local populations rather than the interests of foreign corporations.

Their efforts are crucial in fostering a sense of urgency among communities, encouraging them to demand their rights and challenge the status quo.

International actors’ role

International actors, including NGOs and foreign governments, play a significant role in the DRC’s extractive landscape.

While some organisations work to promote human rights and sustainable development, others contribute to the problem by prioritising profits over people.

The international community must take a more active role in holding corporations accountable for their actions and supporting initiatives that empower local communities.

Efforts to promote ethical sourcing of minerals, such as the Responsible Cobalt Initiative, aim to ensure that the extraction of resources does not come at the expense of human rights.

However, these initiatives must be expanded and rigorously enforced to have a meaningful impact.

Moving forward: Path to equality

To address the root causes of inequality in the DRC, a multifaceted approach is necessary. This includes promoting good governance, enhancing transparency in the extractive sector, and ensuring that local communities have a say in resource management.

Investments in education, healthcare, and infrastructure are crucial to improving the living conditions of marginalised communities. By prioritising social and economic development over short-term profits, the DRC can begin to break the cycle of poverty and inequality that has plagued the nation for decades.

Education, awareness importance

Education plays a pivotal role in empowering communities to understand their rights and the potential consequences of extractivism.

Programmes that focus on educating local populations about their legal rights, environmental issues, and the dynamics of the extractive industry can foster a more informed citizenry.

When communities are educated, they are better equipped to advocate for themselves and hold corporations and governments accountable.

Furthermore, raising awareness on a global scale about the issues faced by communities in the DRC can mobilise international support and pressure governments and corporations to act ethically.

Documentaries, social media campaigns, and partnerships with international NGOs can help amplify these voices, ensuring that the struggles of marginalised communities are not forgotten.

Conclusion

The recent events in Goma serve as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding extractivism and inequality in the DRC. As the country grapples with the challenges posed by conflict and exploitation, it is essential to amplify the voices of marginalised communities and support their efforts to reclaim their rights.

Only through collective action and a commitment to equitable resource management can the DRC hope to transform its wealth of natural resources into a catalyst for sustainable development and social justice.

By addressing the underlying causes of inequality and enabling communities to participate actively in the governance of their resources, the DRC can pave the way for a more just and equitable future.

The journey will be difficult, but with sustained effort and collaboration, a brighter future is possible for the people of Congo.

  • Mafa (formerly Mutowekuziva) is a registered legal practitioner. She has a keen interest in human rights, development and governance. These weekly articles are coordinated by Lovemore Kadenge, an independent consultant, managing consultant of Zawale Consultants (Pvt) Limited, past president of the Zimbabwe Economics Society and past president of the Chartered Governance & Accountancy Institute in Zimbabwe. — [email protected] or mobile: +263 772 382 852

 

Related Topics